I have just finished reading Gossip from the Forest by Sara Maitland- an evocative account of how our culture is intertwined with woodland. No examples are more obvious than fairy tales: Snow White gets lost in the forest when running from the Queen’s huntsman, and finds helpful woodland creature allies; Sleeping Beauty is taken to be raised by the Three Good Fairies in a woodland cottage; Hansel and Gretel are lost in the forest, and find the witch’s gingerbread house. Woods are also integral to classic modern tales such as Tolkien’s The Hobbit (Mirkwood, with spiders and the Elvenking) and The Lord of the Rings (The Old Forest, dark and menacing; Fangorn, home to Treebeard and the Ents; the Golden Wood of Lorien, dwelling-place of Galadriel).
The author mulls over how, with woodland facing numerous challenges to its survival today (not least from greedy property developers and our government), and the situation worsening, how more woodland could be protected. With reading the book, it is obvious: we need to get more people into the woods.
People who are lucky enough to grow up near woods have many fond memories of them. We walk the dog there; go hunting for mushrooms in spring and autumn; go holly-picking in winter to make a wreath for the front door. As children we made dens there; our parents hid Easter eggs in Springtime, and draw chalk arrows on stones to make a trail; as teenagers we made campfires and drank cider in the larch glades in the summer (we took our litter with us and made sure the fire was out before we left).
In short, we have memories of woods. We are connected to them emotionally. Thus when woodland is threatened, we protect it: we sign petitions, go on protests, raise money. Because the woods matter to us.
But we were the lucky ones. We lived near the woods. We had that chance.
Why would woods (if you’ll excuse the pun) matter to somebody who grew up in a city? Even if they have read The Lord of the Rings, they will not have the same kind of emotional connection to the woods as a country-dweller.
So. If we want our woods to be loved and protected, we need to restore them to their rightful place in our cultural identity. The forests of oak, ash and thorn are as English as cups of tea, cardigans, rain, and politeness.
To do this, we need to get people into the woods.
But many people live several hours’ drive away, if not more, from a wood. That is too far to go for a casual afternoon’s walk.
We need something really good.
Really, really good.
We need concerts, plays, circuses. Festivals! Weekend retreats! It doesn’t matter. It just has to be good, and it has to be worth the two-hour drive to get there.
Obviously, not every wood is suitable for such events. Some are Sites of Special Scientific interest (SSSIs). Some are on steep mountainsides. Some are too dense, or too dark.
But there are some where this could work.
Take ‘Theatre in the Woods’, Grange Park Opera’s new project to build a new 700-seat theatre based on Milan’s La Scala. This opera theatre will be based in a woodland on a Surrey estate owned by former University Challenge host Bamber Gascoigne. This is a win-win situation: a great setting for the opera, more events all year-round, and (presumably) some money for Gascoigne.
This idea is not new. The Americans, with their summer camps and large National Parks have been doing this for decades. We need to do it too.
We need more projects like this, more theatre in the woods, if the woods are to survive.
Recent Comments